Skip to main content
· 6/7/2002

Hancock v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 206 F. Supp. 2d 757
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10703
  • 2002 WL 1307295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect, as it is vacated, and the new hearing is conducted de novo
  • noting the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect, as it is vacated, and the new hearing is conducted de novo
  • on remand, the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect as it is vacated and the new hearing is conducted de novo
  • on remand, the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect as it is vacated and the new hearing is conducted de novo
  • on remand, the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect, as it is vacated and the new hearing is conducted de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kiser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.