· 6/7/2002
Hancock v. Barnhart
Citations
- 206 F. Supp. 2d 757
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10703
- 2002 WL 1307295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect, as it is vacated, and the new hearing is conducted de novo
- noting the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect, as it is vacated, and the new hearing is conducted de novo
- on remand, the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect as it is vacated and the new hearing is conducted de novo
- on remand, the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect as it is vacated and the new hearing is conducted de novo
- on remand, the ALJ’s prior decision has no preclusive effect, as it is vacated and the new hearing is conducted de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kiser
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.