Skip to main content
· 5/20/1884

Hanchett v. Riverdale Distillery Co.

Citations

  • 15 Ill. App. 57
  • 1884 Ill. App. LEXIS 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting in dicta that a claim for enforcement of a covenant not to sue \accrue[s] immediately when the [party in breach] file[s] suit\
  • “[T]he determination of an essential issue is binding in a subsequent action, even if it recurs in the context of a different claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.