Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/15/1959
Hance v. State Roads Commission
Citations
- 156 A.2d 644
- 221 Md. 164
- 1959 Md. LEXIS 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[cjourts are reluctant to set aside verdicts for errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence unless they cause substantial injustice”
- “Courts are reluctant to set aside verdicts for errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence unless they cause substantial injustice.”
- in condemnation context, comparable sales before and after valuation date are admissible if not too remote in time
- “substantial prejudice [must] be shown”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brune, Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-27· cited 139×
- Beahm v. ShortallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-07· cited 103×
- Exxon Corp. v. YaremaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-06· cited 69×
- Crane v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-26· cited 51×
- Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1967-11-21· cited 38×
- State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. v. BillmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-10-17· cited 35×
- State Roads Commission v. KuenneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-10-20· cited 34×
- Manning v. Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1968-02-05· cited 33×
- Barksdale v. WilkowskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-23· cited 30×
- State v. Heirs of Halemano KapahiHawaii Supreme Court· 1964-10-01· cited 30×
- State Roads Commission v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-21· cited 27×
- Brinsfield v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-07-20· cited 23×
- BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-07-21· cited 20×
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-21· cited 20×
- Socony Vacuum Oil Company v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1969-09-05· cited 19×
- Sanner v. GuardCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-10-14· cited 19×
- Maryland Community Developers, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1971-10-12· cited 17×
- Mason v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-07-15· cited 15×
- State Roads Commission v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-08-29· cited 14×
- Mayor of Baltimore v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-27· cited 13×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Congressional School of Aeronautics, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-20· cited 53×
- Housing Authority of City of Dallas v. ShambryCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1952-11-05· cited 46×
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Smith & Schwartz Brick Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1895-02-28· cited 40×
- Turner v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-06-03· cited 36×
- State Roads Com. of Md. v. NovoselCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1971-10-01· cited 33×
- City of Houston v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1958-02-06· cited 32×
- Battisto v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-07-12· cited 25×
- Roberts v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1889-06-18· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.