Hamrick v. Shifflett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that four-hour delay in treating plaintiff’s broken ankle did not constitute sufficiently serious deprivation of medical treatment
• affirming a district court's grant of summary judgment on a deliberate indifference claim where the plaintiff had argued that the defendants demonstrated deliberate indifference to his broken ankle by allowing four hours to pass before transporting him to the emergency room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).