Hampton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an in camera proceeding to determine whether the failure to obtain identity of confidential informant was harmful was required, where testimony of undercover police officer working with confidential informant conflicted with the testimony of defendant
• concluding that an in camera proceeding to determine whether the failure to obtain identity of confidential informant was harmful was required, where testimony of undercover police officer working with confidential informant conflicted with the testimony of defendant
• remanded for post-trial hearing to determine if failure to obtain informant's identity prejudiced defense
• remanded for post-trial hearing to determine if failure to obtain informant’s identity prejudiced defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McClarity v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-08-24· cited 57×
• White v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-03-09· cited 14×
• Upshaw v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-12-07· cited 4×
• Sorrells v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-28· cited 3×
• Euresio Sorrells v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-28

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-06-02· cited 68×
• Gibbs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-05-02· cited 15×
• Ponder v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-04-03· cited 15×
• Mozingo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-08-01· cited 2×