Hampton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an indictment that fails to charge a mens rea element but otherwise validly charges a crime may be amended to add the mens rea element
• holding that an indictment that fails to charge a mens rea element but otherwise validly charges a crime may be amended to add the mens rea element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brooks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-03-02· cited 63×
• Sullens v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-10-10· cited 22×
• Sellers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-12-23· cited 13×
• Carruth v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-08-26· cited 13×
• Harrison v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-04-25· cited 12×
• Holloway v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-09-29· cited 3×
• Hayes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-10-01· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Hampton
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-07-21· cited 7×
• Hampton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-10-29· cited 5×
• Lambert v. City of Henagar
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-03-03· cited 1×