Hampton v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Brown is “clearly in point” on the issue of posttrial motion specificity in the context of jury instructions issues
• noting that Brown is \clearly in point\ on the issue of posttrial motion specificity in the context of jury instructions issues
• while inclusion of instructions verbatim in posttrial motion is not, alone, sufficient for the specificity requirement without an accompanying factual or legal basis, this may be a factor
• while inclusion of instructions verbatim in posttrial motion is not, alone, sufficient for the specificity requirement without an accompanying factual or legal basis, this may be a factor
• these are the “bare requirements of a sufficient” posttrial motion
• these are the \bare requirements of a sufficient\ posttrial motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).