Skip to main content
· 7/11/1973

Hampton v. Schauer

Citations

  • 361 F. Supp. 641
  • 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting testimony of State Public Defender “that he is required to represent indigent defendants in the trial court and in direct appeals from convictions” and that “[h]e is not required to conduct post-conviction proceedings for inmates, but is authorized to do so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.