Skip to main content
· 4/6/2009

Hampton v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 561 F.3d 709
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7060
  • 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,523
  • 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1670
  • 2009 WL 902289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a disputed fact is material only if it could affect the outcome of the lawsuit
  • explaining that a general release typically covers all claims about which a signing party has actual knowledge or that he could have discovered upon reasonable investigation
  • finding that a fact is material if it might affect the outcome of the suit
  • explaining that a general release typical‐ ly covers all claims about which a signing party has actual knowledge or that he could have discovered upon reasona‐ ble investigation
  • finding release barred employment discrimination claim because plaintiff knew of alleged conduct prior to signing the release
  • looking no further than the waiver and finding that a waiver signed by a female employee as part of a buyout agreement with her employer unambiguously released the employer from any liability for the employee’s Title VII sexual harassment and discrimination claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Evans, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.