Skip to main content
· 6/25/1958

Hampton v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 30 T.C. 708
  • 1958 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “party must present more than mere speculation or conjecture to defeat a summary judgment motion”
  • holding that “made with fresh, regional ingredients” is not misleading
  • finding that a plaintiff lacked standing in a class action consumer products case where he alleged injury relating to products that he did not buy that were similar to those he had bought
  • noting that plaintiff lacked standing for a product he did not purchase
  • collecting cases finding that labels featuring certain ingredients are not misleading even when other ingredients are used
  • explaining that summary judgment is frequently referred to as the “proverbial put up or shut up” phase of a case, “when a party must show what evidence it has that would convince a trier of fact to accept its version of events”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.