· 6/25/1958
Hampton v. Commissioner
Citations
- 30 T.C. 708
- 1958 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a “party must present more than mere speculation or conjecture to defeat a summary judgment motion”
- holding that “made with fresh, regional ingredients” is not misleading
- finding that a plaintiff lacked standing in a class action consumer products case where he alleged injury relating to products that he did not buy that were similar to those he had bought
- noting that plaintiff lacked standing for a product he did not purchase
- collecting cases finding that labels featuring certain ingredients are not misleading even when other ingredients are used
- explaining that summary judgment is frequently referred to as the “proverbial put up or shut up” phase of a case, “when a party must show what evidence it has that would convince a trier of fact to accept its version of events”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bruce
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.