Skip to main content
· 5/30/2000

Hampton Dillard v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Citations

  • 32 Va. App. 515
  • 529 S.E.2d 325
  • 2000 Va. App. LEXIS 399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing sufficiency of the evidence to support convictions for forging and uttering a check
  • requiring only that known forged writing be passed as valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.