Hampers v. Darling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The parties here limited the obligation to maintain and keep in good repair. They did not include replacement. If the parties so intended, they would have used the word ‘replace’ and any ambiguity as to meaning would have been clear.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).