Hamp v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any error in the admission of evidence is harmless when like evidence was presented to the jury through other means
• holding that the appellant's complaint about the prosecution's statements during voir dire were waived because the appellant did not object to them at the time
• holding that the appellant’s complaint about the prosecution’s statements during voir dire were waived because the appellant did not object to them at the time
• holding that the appellant’s complaint about the prosecution’s statements during voir dire were waived because the appellant did not object to them at the time
• holding that the appellant's complaint about the prosecution's statements during voir dire were waived because the appellant did not object to them at the time
• stating that to preserve an objection for prosecutorial misconduct one must not only object but also request an instruction to disregard and move for a mistrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).