Hamo v. Wilson (In Re Hamo)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fraudulent intent can be inferred from conduct and/or a continuing pattern of false statements or omissions
• stating that a debt- or’s intent may be inferred from circumstantial evidence or from a debtor’s course of conduct.
• listing 11 non-exclusive factors to be considered to determine whether ORC § 2329.66(A)(10)(a) should apply such as debtor’s health, debtor’s ability to work and earn a living and debtor’s job skills, training and education
• “The burden is on the trustee to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the exemption should be disallowed.”
• “The burden is on the trustee to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the exemption should be disallowed.”
• “The burden is on the trustee to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the exemption should be disallowed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).