Skip to main content
· 3/13/2002

Hammons v. Jenkins-Griffith

Citations

  • 764 N.E.2d 303
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 390
  • 2002 WL 387269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that great-grandparents were not entitled to petition for grandparent visitation rights because Grandparent Visitation Act applied only to \grandparents\
  • finding that plain meaning of “grandparents” does not include great-grandparents
  • “we decline to expand the plain meaning of the statute by including great-grandparents as „grandparents‟”
  • “The specific inclusion of one entity usually precludes the implication of another entity’s inclusion in the same statutory provision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mattingly-May, Baker, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.