Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/27/2019
Hammond v. Hammond
Citations
- 438 P.3d 408
- 296 Or. App. 321
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a claim of adverse possession must be proved by clear and convincing evidence that allows for a finding that the truth of the facts asserted is highly probable
- applying discovery rule in ORS 12.010 to 12.050, formerly chapter 1, title II, section 4(1) of 1862 Code
- relying on our opinion in Goodwin v. Kingsman Plastering, Inc., 267 Or App 506, 340 P3d 169 (2014), aff’d on other grounds, 359 Or 694, 375 P3d 463 (2016)
- “[o]nly after an actual repudiation occurs or an adverse claim is asserted against the owner’s interest is a landowner required to take legal action to protect that interest”
- “Only after an actual repudiation occurs or an adverse claim is asserted against the owner’s interest is a landowner required to take legal action to protect [their] interest.”
- “Only after an actual repudiation occurs or an adverse claim is asserted against the owner’s interest is a landowner required to take legal action to protect [their] interest.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Shorr, Tookey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hathaway v. B & J Property Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-03· cited 9×
- Romero v. AmburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-12-29· cited 5×
- Stone v. CCXL, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-02· cited 4×
- Deschutes County v. Pink Pit, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-09-23· cited 3×
- Powers v. DagueCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-13· cited 3×
- State v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-09-23· cited 2×
- Devlin v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 2×
- Casebeer v. Krocker (In re Estate of Casebeer)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-24· cited 1×
- Kramer v. ConatserCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-02· cited 1×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court· 1966-12-28· cited 208×
- Stupakoff v. Otto (GmbH & Co. KG)Second Circuit· 2008-10-06· cited 63×
- T. R. v. Boy Scouts of AmericaOregon Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 43×
- Coos County v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 1987-04-07· cited 42×
- Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-12-30· cited 34×
- Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 30×
- Meier v. KellyOregon Supreme Court· 1892-03-22· cited 26×
- Scott v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court· 1969-03-12· cited 25×
- Allison v. ShepherdOregon Supreme Court· 1979-03-08· cited 23×
- Rice v. RabbOregon Supreme Court· 2014-01-30· cited 22×
- Association of Unit Owners of the Inn at Otter Crest v. Far West Federal BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-12· cited 21×
- Rise v. SteckelCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-10-13· cited 20×
- Evans v. HogueOregon Supreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 19×
- Oliphant v. FrenchOregon Supreme Court· 1970-07-22· cited 13×
- Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-07· cited 12×
- Sea River Properties, LLC v. ParksOregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-14· cited 11×
- Stiles v. GodseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-12-30· cited 11×
- Fitts v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-15· cited 9×
- Shields v. VillarealCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.