Skip to main content

Hammond v. Hammond

Citations

  • 438 P.3d 408
  • 296 Or. App. 321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a claim of adverse possession must be proved by clear and convincing evidence that allows for a finding that the truth of the facts asserted is highly probable
  • applying discovery rule in ORS 12.010 to 12.050, formerly chapter 1, title II, section 4(1) of 1862 Code
  • relying on our opinion in Goodwin v. Kingsman Plastering, Inc., 267 Or App 506, 340 P3d 169 (2014), aff’d on other grounds, 359 Or 694, 375 P3d 463 (2016)
  • “[o]nly after an actual repudiation occurs or an adverse claim is asserted against the owner’s interest is a landowner required to take legal action to protect that interest”
  • “Only after an actual repudiation occurs or an adverse claim is asserted against the owner’s interest is a landowner required to take legal action to protect [their] interest.”
  • “Only after an actual repudiation occurs or an adverse claim is asserted against the owner’s interest is a landowner required to take legal action to protect [their] interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Shorr, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.