Hammond v. Hammond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s determination that it was in the children’s best interest to be in the care of their father was affirmed because 14 there was at least some evidence to support it despite the fact that there was evidence in the record pointing in the other direction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haskell v. Haskell
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-11-02· cited 22×
• Amoakuh v. Issaka
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-05-23· cited 11×
• Rumley-Miawama v. Miawama
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-01-12· cited 10×
• Phillips v. Phillips.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-10-04· cited 9×
• Pennington v. Pennington
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-05-29· cited 9×
• King v. King
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-09-22· cited 7×
• Ansell v. Ansell
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-07-10· cited 6×
• Seth Ansell v. Anna A. Ansell
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-07-10
• In the Interest of M. J. H., a Child
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-02-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wright v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-09-22· cited 96×
• Urquhart v. Urquhart
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-07-05· cited 28×
• Crowder v. Crowder
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-02-26· cited 18×
• Southerland v. Southerland
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-05-24· cited 15×
• Stanley v. Stanley
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-02-26· cited 6×
• Cook v. Cook
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-07-13· cited 5×