Hammond v. Freeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that compliance with § 2513, including submission of a certificate of innocence from the federal district court, is a prerequisite to the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims
• examining prior case law and concluding that Grayson and Moore, among other cases, constitute binding precedent that have not been reversed en banc
• “Accordingly, this court holds that compliance with § 2513, including submission of a certificate of innocence from the federal district court, is a prerequisite to the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.”
• “While the judgment does certify that plaintiff’s conviction was reversed, it does not affirm that plaintiff did not commit any of the acts charged . . . [nor does it] include any statement indicating that plaintiff was not responsible for his own prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).