Hammond v. City of Tampa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim was waived on appeal where the appellant failed to develop meaningful argument
• holding that the appellant’s claim was waived on appeal where he failed to develop meaningful argument beyond citing boilerplate law and asserting that the evidence fell short of such law.
• stating that this Court may find waiver pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a) based on an appellant’s “failure to develop meaningful argument with specific reference to the record in support of his claims”
• applying Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a) to find waiver where the appellant failed to develop meaningful argument with specific reference to the record in support of his claims
• finding claim to be waived by the appellant's failure to develop meaningful argument with specific reference to the record in support of his claims
• applying Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a) to find waiver where the appellant failed to develop meaningful argument with specific reference to the record in support of his claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).