Hammett v. Sprowl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding, on a motion for summary judgment, that citations to the patent-in-suit in an IDS were insufficient to show that the defendant had actual knowledge because there was no evidence that the defendant played any role in creating or reviewing IDSs and had a general practice of not doing so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).