Hammer v. Waterhouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing defense during closing argument to imply that there were other defendants that plaintiff could pursue in order to respond to portions of the plaintiffs closing argument leading the jury to believe the plaintiff had no other recourse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Delacroix v. Doncasters, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-05-07· cited 45×
• Slankard v. Thomas
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-10-31· cited 35×
• Porter v. Reardon MacHine Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-02-24· cited 23×
• Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-11-26· cited 21×
• Dillard v. Shaughnessy, Fickel & Scott Architects, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-02-25· cited 20×
• Coats v. Hickman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-12-28· cited 18×
• Brandt v. Csaki
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-11-19· cited 18×
• Swearingen v. Dryden
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-02-06· cited 16×
• Nolte v. Wittmaier
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-07-28· cited 15×
• Hearod v. Baggs
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-08-23· cited 8×
• Boshears v. Saint-Gobain Calmar, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-08-12· cited 7×
• Enos v. Ryder Automotive Operations, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-03-19· cited 7×
• Ayers v. Myers
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-12-24· cited 5×
• Morrissey v. Morrissey
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-10-22· cited 4×
• St. Francis Medical Center v. Hargrove
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-12-16· cited 4×
• Potter v. Kley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-10-22· cited 3×
• Ellison v. Ivaska
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-06-23· cited 2×
• Union Electric Co. v. Barnhart
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-01-27