Skip to main content
· 1/24/1995

Hammer v. Waterhouse

Citations

  • 895 S.W.2d 95
  • 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 105
  • 1995 WL 23585

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing defense during closing argument to imply that there were other defendants that plaintiff could pursue in order to respond to portions of the plaintiffs closing argument leading the jury to believe the plaintiff had no other recourse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fenner, Hanna, Stith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.