Hammer Corp. v. Wade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[L]anguage is unambiguous if it is capable of only one reasonable interpretation.” (alteration in original) (quoting Caswell v. Anderson, 241 Ga.App. 703, 527 S.E.2d 582, 584 (2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).