Skip to main content
· 1/10/1994

Hammel v. Hammel

Citations

  • 636 A.2d 214
  • 431 Pa. Super. 230
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the appeal taken from trial court’s March 18, 1993 final order granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings was untimely with respect to the trial court’s December 29, 1992 order denying the defendant’s petition to open/strike judgment
  • addressing the merits of claims related to the trial court’s final, appealable order after concluding the appeal was untimely with respect to the prior order denying the defendant’s petition to open/strike judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Johnson, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.