Hammatt v. Emerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the absence of findings of fact, we presume that all factual findings were made in accordance with the result reached
• holding that where no factual findings are made, we view “the facts in the light most favorable to the trial court’s judgment”
• holding that where no factual findings are made, we view \the facts in the light most favorable to the trial court's judgment\
• recognizing that. White sets out the applicable standard of review for an appeal in a court-tried civil case
• holding that \[t]he burden of persuasion and the burden of production [for challenges to statutes] never shift to the defendants\
• holding this Court reviews de novo the application of law to given facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).