Skip to main content
· 1/25/1989

Hamm v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Citations

  • 704 F. Supp. 357
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 774
  • 1989 WL 5198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to hold union liable for portion of damages caused by its breach but stating that damages can be apportioned when the union “exacerbate[s the employee’s] loss or diminution of wages, beyond that for which the employer could be charged”
  • union is not liable for back pay where employee is foreclosed from recovering against company by his dismissal of claim against company at trial
  • trial court may weigh evidence and consider credibility of witnesses
  • assessing the employer for all backpay
  • assessing the employer for all backpay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Curtin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.