Hamm v. Manfredi (In Re Manfredi)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even if allegation was true that debt was due, in part, to gambling, it would not support a finding of bad faith
• “in the absence of any evidence to support that the omission ... was more than an oversight, the omissions are not material to a determination of bad faith”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hackerman v. Demeza (In re Demeza)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-02-21· cited 9×
• 1200 Buena Vista Condominiums v. Young (In Re Young)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-03-30· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hamilton v. Lanning
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 365×
• In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-02-26· cited 363×
• In Re Margaret J. Myers, Debtor. Margaret J. Myers
  Third Circuit· 2007-06-21· cited 171×
• In Re Ernest R. Lilley, Jr., Debtor. Ernest R. Lilley, Jr.
  Third Circuit· 1996-07-31· cited 129×
• In Re: Ronald M. Tamecki, Sr., Debtor Ronald M. Tamecki, Sr. v. Lawrence G. Frank
  Third Circuit· 2000-09-27· cited 124×
• Perlin v. Hitachi Capital America Corp.
  Third Circuit· 2007-08-03· cited 65×
• Jensen v. Froio (In Re Jensen)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-06-11· cited 24×
• In Re LeGree
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2002-08-21· cited 18×
• In Re Dahlgren
  D. New Jersey· 2009-11-09· cited 15×
• In Re Gonyer
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-11-05· cited 10×
• Andrews v. Kerschner (In Re Kerschner)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-03-28· cited 5×
• In Re Quinn
  D. Delaware· 2009-12-29· cited 4×