Hamm v. Canal Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting public policy argument that MCA-90 endorsement establishes a $750,000 per-person limit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Armstrong v. United States Fire Insurance
  E.D. Tennessee· 2009-03-27· cited 20×
• Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Estate of Karpov
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-03-17· cited 8×
• Real Legacy Assurance Co. v. Santori Trucking, Inc.
  D. Puerto Rico· 2008-06-11· cited 2×
• Carolina Casualty Insurance Co v. Estate of Dimitry Karpov
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-03-17