Hamm v. Arrowcreek Homeowners' Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that NRS 38.310 applies where interpreting the CC&Rs is necessary to resolve the merits of the case
• holding that where the dispute would require the district court to interpret the CC&Rs, the action must first be submitted to NRED mediation and arbitration
• concluding that NRS 38.310 applies where interpreting the CC&Rs is necessary to resolve the merits of the case
• holding that where the dispute would require the district court to interpret the CC&Rs, the action must first be submitted to NRED mediation and arbitration
• concluding that NRS 38.310 applies where interpreting the CC&Rs is necessary to resolve the merits of the case
• concluding, however, in addressing an equal protection argument, that the two groups at issue were not being treated differently

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).