Hamlin v. TRANS-DAPT OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting judgment as a matter of law on a TCPA claim because \there [was] no indication that [the plaintiff's] loss was caused by ... reliance on a false impression\ created by the defendant
• granting judgment as a matter of law on a TCPA claim because \there [was] no indication that [the plaintiff's] loss was caused by ... reliance on a false impression\ created by the defendant
• To overcome preemption, a state law claim “must contain a meaningful additional element”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).