Skip to main content
· 1/30/1998

Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 953 P.2d 1027
  • 263 Kan. 875
  • 1998 Kan. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that our review is unlimited where the issue is interpretation of a statute
  • noting that our review is unlimited where the issue is interpretation of a statute
  • insurance claim was liquidated and prejudgment interest appropriate even though damages left to jury, because no dispute as to amount of damages and no other damages supported by evidence
  • if loss covered by policy that insures property against fire, tornado, lightning, or hail, K.S.A. 40-908 applies regardless of whether actual loss occurred by one of those causes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.