· 1/30/1998
Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Citations
- 953 P.2d 1027
- 263 Kan. 875
- 1998 Kan. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that our review is unlimited where the issue is interpretation of a statute
- noting that our review is unlimited where the issue is interpretation of a statute
- insurance claim was liquidated and prejudgment interest appropriate even though damages left to jury, because no dispute as to amount of damages and no other damages supported by evidence
- if loss covered by policy that insures property against fire, tornado, lightning, or hail, K.S.A. 40-908 applies regardless of whether actual loss occurred by one of those causes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.