Hamilton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even if the police were correct in believing that the defendant was engaged in a drug transaction, such a belief did not create the specific, articulable facts required to justify a weapons pat-down

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Burns
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-15· cited 16×
• Campuzano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-08· cited 16×
• Turner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-31· cited 9×
• In the Interest of J.L.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-15· cited 3×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-02· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Reynolds v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-02· cited 110×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-02· cited 11×
• Strebel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-18· cited 1×