Skip to main content
· 4/23/1969

Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.

Citations

  • 434 Pa. 90
  • 252 A.2d 601
  • 1969 Pa. LEXIS 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, as a general proposition, that factual findings can be disturbed “if there has been a capricious disregard of competent evidence or if there is no evidence at all to support the finding”
  • stating, as a general proposition, that factual findings can be disturbed \if there has been a capricious disregard of competent evidence or if there is no evidence at all to support the finding\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.