· 4/23/1969
Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.
Citations
- 434 Pa. 90
- 252 A.2d 601
- 1969 Pa. LEXIS 411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating, as a general proposition, that factual findings can be disturbed “if there has been a capricious disregard of competent evidence or if there is no evidence at all to support the finding”
- stating, as a general proposition, that factual findings can be disturbed \if there has been a capricious disregard of competent evidence or if there is no evidence at all to support the finding\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Cohen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.