Skip to main content
· 3/11/2010

Hamilton v. Pechacek

Citations

  • 319 S.W.3d 801
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1793
  • 2010 WL 851410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that review focuses on whether inmate’s lawsuit has arguable basis in law when no evidentiary hearing is held
  • holding that review focuses on whether inmate's lawsuit has arguable basis in law when no evidentiary hearing is held
  • holding that review focuses on whether the inmate’s lawsuit has an arguable basis in law when no evidentiary hearing is held
  • holding that review focuses on whether the inmate‘s lawsuit has an arguable basis in law when no evidentiary hearing is held
  • holding that inmate's claims for violations of the penal code lacked arguable bases in law
  • holding that inmate’s claims for violations of the penal code lacked arguable bases in law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Walker, Meier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.