Hamilton v. Paulson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any irregularities must indicate discriminatory hiring practices
• stating that \reverse discrimination\ analysis applies where a male claims a violation of Title VII's protection against gender discrimination
• holding judicial notice may be taken of public records and government documents available from reliable sources on the internet
• noting that Burrell “received the highest ranking possible in every single category for her 2002-2003 annual performance appraisal — i.e., the appraisal covering her time on the management detail”
• noting that Burrell “received the highest ranking possible in every single category for her 2002-2003 annual performance appraisal—i.e., the appraisal covering her time on the management detail”
• explaining that the “diversity of the interviewing panel, uniformity of the questions asked, and presence of the same interviewers at each interview bolster the Court’s conclusion that the interviewing panel sought the candidate that was most qualified”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).