Skip to main content
· 12/31/1986

Hamilton v. Needham

Citations

  • 519 A.2d 172
  • 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment, granted without expert testimony, for plaintiff whose attorney omitted from his will a residuary clause the plaintiff had requested, thereby causing his residual estate to pass intestate
  • affirming summary judgment, granted without expert testimony, for plaintiff whose attorney omitted from his will a residuary clause the plaintiff had requested, thereby causing his residual estate to pass intestate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferren, Rogers, Steadman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.