· 12/31/1986
Hamilton v. Needham
Citations
- 519 A.2d 172
- 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 517
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming summary judgment, granted without expert testimony, for plaintiff whose attorney omitted from his will a residuary clause the plaintiff had requested, thereby causing his residual estate to pass intestate
- affirming summary judgment, granted without expert testimony, for plaintiff whose attorney omitted from his will a residuary clause the plaintiff had requested, thereby causing his residual estate to pass intestate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferren, Rogers, Steadman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.