Hamilton v. Martin Color-Fi, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim for unjust enrichment should not be dismissed because the court may find that the express contract was no longer in force
• holding that a claim for unjust enrichment should not be dismissed because the court may find that the express contract was no longer in force
• holding that a claim for unjust enrichment should not be dismissed because the court may find that the express contract was no longer in force
• holding that “plaintiff was entitled to plead alternative” claims of contract-and quasi-contract
• holding that “plaintiffs conduct did not demonstrate an actual intention to relinquish its right” where the evidence showed that he “immediately and consistently made objections ... and that he formalized his objections in letters”
• finding claim for payments due under sales commission contract to be analogous to claims for payments under an installment contract, which accrue as each payment becomes due.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).