· 9/16/1997
Hamilton v. Laine
Citations
- 57 Cal. App. 4th 885
- 67 Cal. Rptr. 2d 407
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7420
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 11933
- 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 731
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding invalid nunc pro tunc order that “materially altered the relative rights of the parties affected by the original order in a manner not contemplated”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruvolo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.