Hamilton v. Howard University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since [employer] produced evidence that it suspended and terminated [employee] for a legitimate, non- discriminatory reason, we need not analyze whether plaintiffs made out a prima facie case of . . . age discrimination.”
• ―While we examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, ‗[c]onclusory allegations by the nonmoving party are insufficient to establish a genuine issue of material fact or to defeat the entry of summary judgment.‘‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).