Hamilton v. Heitzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, particularly in cases where parties are struggling for control of a corporation, “complainant must establish that it is his clear legal right, not doubtful or uncertain, to the specific relief sought; otherwise the preliminary injunction will be dissolved”
• stating affirmative action is necessary which will disclose a corporate purpose, reason and program
• officer’s or shareholder’s individual expression of opinion insufficient to make a corporate opportunity
• officer's or shareholder's individual expression of opinion insufficient to make a corporate opportunity
• “[w]hat is necessary is some affirmative action by the corporate organization which will disclose a corporate purpose, reason and program * * *. [TJhis would have required action by the directors acting as a board, and not singularly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).