Hamilton v. Hamilton
Citations
- 89 Ill. 349
Syllabus
<p>1. Married women—power to contract with husband. Since the act of March 30,1874, relating to married women, took effect, a wife may make contracts with her husband for lawful purposes, except so far as is otherwise provided in the act itself, and they may be enforced.</p> <p>2. Contract—when against public policy. A contract between husband and wife, pending a suit by the latter for a divorce, by which the husband agrees to convey certain land to the wife and pay her §500, and she to unite with him in conveying his other real estate to a third person, released from all claim of dower and homestead on her. part, though the husband does not expressly agree not to resist the suit for divorce, is contrary to public policy and invalid, as tending to open a door for the attainment of divorces by collusion.</p>
Judges: Dickey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sims v. SimsMississippi Supreme Court· 1920-03-15· cited 32×
- Phillips v. ThorpOregon Supreme Court· 1883-03-15· cited 25×
- Birch v. AnthonySupreme Court of Georgia· 1899-11-30· cited 22×
- Tomlinson v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court· 1881-03-21· cited 22×
- Roten v. TesdellSupreme Court of Iowa· 1923-03-13· cited 21×
- Worrell v. ForsythIllinois Supreme Court· 1892-03-26· cited 19×
- Luttrell v. BoggsIllinois Supreme Court· 1897-11-01· cited 16×
- Craig v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1936-07-07· cited 13×
- Wolkovisky v. RapaportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1913-10-22· cited 13×
- Klampe v. KlampeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1917-06-15· cited 12×
- Shankland v. ShanklandIllinois Supreme Court· 1922-02-22· cited 11×
- Edwards v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court· 1915-02-17· cited 8×
- Overstreet v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1934-06-19· cited 7×
- Silberschmidt v. SilberschmidtAppellate Court of Illinois· 1904-02-08· cited 6×
- People v. SimpkinsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-01-13· cited 5×
- Trousseau v. CartwrightHawaii Supreme Court· 1895-10-29· cited 5×
- People v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court· 1951-05-24· cited 4×
- Spreckels v. WakefieldNinth Circuit· 1923-02-19· cited 4×
- Belz v. BelzAppellate Court of Illinois· 1889-05-08· cited 3×
- Sheppey v. StevensN.D. New York· 1910-03-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.