Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/20/1991
Hamilton v. Hamilton
Citations
- 591 A.2d 720
- 404 Pa. Super. 533
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1410
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the lack of a reasonable provision for a financially dependent spouse does not render an antenuptial agreement unenforceable
- antenuptial agreement not signed under duress where the wife, although “pregnant, unemployed, and probably frightened,” was represented by counsel and signed the agreement against his advice
- unemployed, pregnant 18-year-old woman could not claim duress in the execution of a prenuptial agreement, where she had the ability to consult with legal counsel concerning the agreement
- the court rejected the claim by the eighteen-year old, unemployed and pregnant woman that she entered into the antenuptial agreement under duress, where she was free to consult her counsel before signing the agreement
- prenuptial agreement upheld where wife specifically waived right to spousal support
- as an example of a pre-marital agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rowley, Wieand, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Degenhardt v. Dillon Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-18· cited 43×
- Lewis, W. v. Lewis, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-06-12· cited 37×
- Sofronski v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-05-28· cited 31×
- Adams v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-19· cited 25×
- West Chester Area SD v. A.M. and K.M., individually and as parents and natural guardians of C.M. and C. Jelley, Hearing Officer, PA Office of Dispute ResolutionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-06-19· cited 9×
- Viles v. VilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-03· cited 6×
- Biliouris v. BiliourisMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-08-17· cited 5×
- Baker v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-30· cited 4×
- Schwarz v. FrostPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-03-16· cited 2×
- Shaffer v. ShafferChester County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-05-16
- Boscaino v. Centre Medical & Surgical AssociatesCentre County Court of Common Pleas· 2006-09-20
- McConahy v. McConahyLawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 2013-09-16
- Layton, R. v. Layton, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-05-23
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-11-15· cited 186×
- Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-25· cited 166×
- Carrier v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-26· cited 74×
- Hillegass EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-08-06· cited 54×
- Bata v. Central-Penn National Bank of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court· 1967-04-17· cited 51×
- Raiken v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-05· cited 37×
- Smith v. LenchnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-12-16· cited 36×
- In Re Estate of GeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-15· cited 25×
- Young v. PileggiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-01-28· cited 11×
- Union National Bank v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.