Hamilton v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• money that husband inherited retained its non-marital status when he placed funds into a separate account, even though he used funds from this inheritance for marital bills
• cash that husband received from an inheritance retained its non-marital status when he placed funds into a separate account, even though he used funds from this inheritance for marital bills
• \The husband's use of some of the [nonmarital] money to pay marital bills does not convert the funds remaining in the separately titled bank account into a marital asset.\
• \The husband's use of some of the [nonmarital] money to pay marital bills does not convert the funds remaining in the separately titled bank account into a marital asset.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mondello v. Torres
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-17· cited 23×
• Lakin v. Lakin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-23· cited 15×
• Grieco v. Grieco
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-13· cited 10×
• Rose v. Rose
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-11-05

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Farrior v. Farrior
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-06-24· cited 20×
• Pinder v. Pinder
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-25· cited 13×