Hamilton v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the finding of paternity by estoppel where the putative father did not begin a relationship with the child’s mother until approximately three years after the child’s birth and where it was undisputed that the child was not the putative father’s biological child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of Shockley
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-11-20· cited 35×
• Gebler v. Gatti
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-02-02· cited 26×
• J.C. v. J.S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-30· cited 25×
• Warfield v. Warfield
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-15· cited 22×
• A.S. v. I.S.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-12-29· cited 22×
• L.S.K. v. H.A.N.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-17· cited 17×
• Wieland v. Wieland
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-05-09· cited 12×
• S.M.C. v. C.A.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-10-22· cited 7×
• J.F. v. D.B.
  Erie County Court Common Pleas· 2004-04-02· cited 1×
• Bkb v. Jgk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-23
• Jc v. Js
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-30
• Lsk v. Han
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-17
• in the Interest of Regan Nicole Shockley, a Minor Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-11-20
• B.K.B. v. M.M.K.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-23
• Caldwell, J. v. Jaurigue, P., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-05-31