Hamilton v. Greyhound Lines East

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the appealing party has the burden of providing a sufficient record such that the appellate court can make an intelligent review
• \The appealing party has the burden of furnishing a sufficient record from which this court can make an intelligent review.\
• “The appealing party has the burden of furnishing a sufficient record from which this court can make an intelligent review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Crestwood Golf Club, Inc. v. Potter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-11-10· cited 42×
• Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-10-08· cited 38×
• Woodson v. DLI Properties, LLC
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-01-08· cited 34×
• Cook v. Eller
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-05-15· cited 15×
• Litchfield Co. of South Carolina, Inc. v. Kiriakides
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-09-22· cited 14×
• Sweatt v. Norman Ex Rel. Estate of Norman
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-11-01· cited 13×
• Winesett v. Winesett
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-12-30· cited 13×
• Meek v. Meek
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-04-04· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Germain v. Nichol
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-01-05· cited 52×