Hamilton v. Ganias

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning in Manning v. Nobile, supra, applies to nineteen year old plaintiff because, “although an underage drinker, [he] was a [legal] adult. . . who was responsible for his own conduct”
• particular circumstances of consumption of alcohol and of accident not important to conclusion that social hosts were not liable to intoxicated guest who injures himself
• adult underage drinker solely responsible for his own voluntary consumption of alcohol

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).