Skip to main content
· 5/23/2007

Hamilton v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

Citations

  • 257 S.W.3d 566
  • 99 Ark. App. 124
  • 2007 Ark. App. LEXIS 394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the arbitration agreement to be unambiguous where it allowed both parties to demand arbitration while, at the same time, allowing both parties to maintain certain rights, such as the right of Ford Motor Credit to protect its security interest in the vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brian S. Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.