Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• invalidating exhaustion clauses because \[the underinsured motorist coverage statute expressly requires underinsured motorist coverage to apply whenever a tortfea-sor's insurance coverage is insufficient to compensate the victim for all damages suffered\
• invalidating exhaustion clauses because \[t]he underinsured motorist coverage statute expressly requires underinsured motorist coverage to apply whenever a tortfeasor's insurance coverage is insufficient to compensate the victim for all damages suffered\
• \the purpose and intent of this statutory scheme prohibits policy provisions which attempt to limit the insured's right to full compensation.\
• a UIM carrier \always is allowed to credit the full amount of the tortfeasor's liability coverage against the insured's damages\
• “the purpose and intent of this statutory scheme prohibits policy provisions which attempt to limit the insured’s right to full compensation. ”
• underinsurer always allowed to credit full amount of tortfeasor’s liability coverage against the insured’s damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).