Supreme Court of Georgia· 3/21/1997
Hamilton v. Cannon
Citations
- 482 S.E.2d 370
- 267 Ga. 655
- 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 970
- 1997 Ga. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the “special relationship” exception exists when the municipality makes promises of an affirmative undertaking
- stating that the \special relationship\ exception exists when the municipality makes promises of an affirmative undertaking
- limiting public duty doctrine to police protection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunstein, Fletcher, Sears, Hines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court· 2001-07-27· cited 201×
- Hamilton v. CannonEleventh Circuit· 1996-04-19· cited 80×
- Coffey v. Brooks CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-09-14· cited 34×
- Rowe v. CoffeySupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-19· cited 30×
- Harper v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-11-15· cited 28×
- Daley v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-11-02· cited 26×
- Department of Human Resources v. ColeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-12-15· cited 26×
- Vance v. T. R. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-12-02· cited 26×
- Govea v. City of NorcrossCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-11-23· cited 25×
- Columbia County v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-02-08· cited 25×
- Georgia Military College v. SantamorenaCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-03-17· cited 24×
- Clive v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-07-13· cited 19×
- Stevenson v. City of DoravilleSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-11-25· cited 11×
- Dollar v. Dalton Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-08-11· cited 10×
- Queen v. City of DouglasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-04-03· cited 9×
- Gregory v. CliveSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-10-09· cited 7×
- Hamilton v. CannonEleventh Circuit· 1997-06-05· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseEleventh Circuit· 1997-06-05
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-06-27· cited 2,024×
- Commerce & Industry Insurance v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court· 1989-08-23· cited 174×
- Kircher v. City of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals· 1989-07-13· cited 148×
- City of Rome v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-03-15· cited 142×
- Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-04-27· cited 134×
- Hamilton v. CannonEleventh Circuit· 1996-04-19· cited 80×
- Department of Transportation v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia· 1996-06-17· cited 75×
- Powell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-02-14· cited 60×
- White v. BeasleyMichigan Supreme Court· 1996-08-01· cited 55×
- Anderson v. Little & Davenport Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-11-22· cited 44×
- Cyran v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-08-19· cited 38×
- Walker v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-05-31· cited 25×
- Landis v. Rockdale CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-03-18· cited 21×
- Allison Gas Turbine Division of General Motors Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-06-02· cited 21×
- Alexander v. HarnickCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1977-07-13· cited 20×
- Crook v. GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-02-22· cited 17×
- Ramundo v. Town of GuilderlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-02-14· cited 15×
- Ward v. City of MillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-04-16· cited 11×
- Tilley v. City of HapevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-06-21· cited 9×
- Ruiz v. PardueCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-04-06· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.