· 1/22/1999
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek
Citations
- 47 F. Supp. 2d 330
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2179
- 1999 WL 167672
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing different rules under Neumeier depending on domicile and place of injury
- California law not displaced by domiciliary law because plaintiff voluntarily came to California on business trip
- California law not displaced by domiciliary law because plaintiff voluntarily came to California on business trip
- “The points of distribution involved many states and vary from company to company; if the significant contact were the point of distribution, so many states’ laws would be involved that consolidation of defendants would be impractical.”
- “The points of distribution involved many states and vary from company to company; if the significant contact were the point of distribution, so many states’ laws would be involved that consolidation of defendants would be impractical.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weinstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.