Skip to main content
· 1/22/1999

Hamilton v. Accu-Tek

Citations

  • 47 F. Supp. 2d 330
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2179
  • 1999 WL 167672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing different rules under Neumeier depending on domicile and place of injury
  • California law not displaced by domiciliary law because plaintiff voluntarily came to California on business trip
  • California law not displaced by domiciliary law because plaintiff voluntarily came to California on business trip
  • “The points of distribution involved many states and vary from company to company; if the significant contact were the point of distribution, so many states’ laws would be involved that consolidation of defendants would be impractical.”
  • “The points of distribution involved many states and vary from company to company; if the significant contact were the point of distribution, so many states’ laws would be involved that consolidation of defendants would be impractical.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weinstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.