Hamilton Partners, L.P. v. Englard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that theory encompasses claims of breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting
• noting that theory encompasses claims of breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting
• noting that, under Delaware corporate law, “[t]he parent corporation does not receive the right to sue as a result of the merger and cannot assert directly the right of the subsidiary”
• noting that, under Delaware corporate law,5 “[t]he parent corporation does not receive the right to sue as a result of the merger and cannot assert directly the right of the subsidiary”
• explaining Delaware’s interest in policing the use of Delaware entities as vehicles for fraud “militates powerfully in favor of retaining jurisdiction”
• taking judicial notice of public filings, pleadings in a prior lawsuit in New York, and a complaint in a related action in the Delaware Court of Chancery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).